- Why shadow AI is a board-level governance signal, not just an IT problem — and what "are you ready for thousands of new insiders?" really means for risk exposure.
- How leading regulatory frameworks (APRA CPS 230, EU AI Act, SR 26-2, NIST AI) are converging on the same governance expectations.
- A 90-day action playbook boards and security leaders can use to close the gap between AI adoption pressure and governance readiness.
Navigating AI Risk: What Boards & Security Leaders Must Act On Now
Key Points
Employees are adopting AI faster than boards can govern it. Shadow AI isn't a hypothetical — it's already inside your organization, and as Mark Arapovic puts it, "the honest answer is: we don't know" how much data has already moved through unsanctioned tools. That's not a comfortable place for a board to be.
In this session, Mark Arapovic (Insider Sales Engineering Specialist, APAC) and John Taylor (Field CTO, APAC) unpack why shadow AI is a canary in a coal mine for governance readiness — and why speed isn't the problem, it's governance. They walk through the regulatory landscape boards can't ignore (APRA CPS 230, the EU AI Act, SR 26-2, NIST AI framework), real breach examples tied to ungoverned AI use, and a 90-day playbook security leaders can act on immediately.
Related Tags
- On-Demand
- Artificial Intelligence